-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Add support for writable file-like objects #167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f740410
Writable file
kylebarron 7457e9b
Rename open to open_reader
kylebarron ac09d0a
fix file reader tests
kylebarron 815ca9c
Constructors for WritableFile
kylebarron 1a740e0
Use `BufWriter::put` instead of `BufWriter::write`
kylebarron ab3f575
Less whitespace in signatures
kylebarron e716603
Improve WritableFile docs
kylebarron 9fe0f9a
Add to docs
kylebarron cf1a76c
Add tests with writable file, add context manager
kylebarron 244c41c
comment
kylebarron fa22331
Add comment
kylebarron 89b728e
Merge branch 'main' into kyle/writable-file
kylebarron File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a little unfortunate that this is a method instead of an attribute.
We need an
Optionsomewhere in order to be able to drop the internalBufWriterto check that it has already been closed. (The object_store API will error if the file is closed twice, but doesn't give a way to check if the file has already been closed).This being an async method is an artifact of storing the underlying BufWriter inside of an
where the
Mutexis atokio::sync::Mutex.Thus we need to use async to open the mutex. We could add a second layer of mutex, where the top-level mutex is a
std::sync::Mutex, but I assume that two levels of mutexes would be detrimental for performance.