Build linux/arm64 ubi9 universal image in GH action

[dkwon17]

Adds the linux/arm64 platform, just like in the ubi build:

developer-images/.github/workflows/ubi9-build.yaml

Line 58 in e24cbd7

platforms: linux/amd64, linux/arm64

[svor]

@dkwon17 in Dockerfile Some binaries that are downloaded are specific to the amd64 architecture. Should we adapt them for arm64 compatibility?

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dkwon17, ibuziuk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[dkwon17]

@svor good idea, I'll see if I can do that this Friday

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[svor]

@dkwon17 did you have a chance to build udi for arm64?
I've tried DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1 docker image build --platform linux/arm64 --progress=plain -t quay.io/devfile/universal-developer-image:ubi9-latest .
but had an error:

#9 0.387 exec /bin/sh: exec format error
#9 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c touch ${PROFILE_EXT} && chown 10001 ${PROFILE_EXT}" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1
------
 > [ 2/44] RUN touch /etc/profile.d/udi_environment.sh && chown 10001 /etc/profile.d/udi_environment.sh:
0.387 exec /bin/sh: exec format error
------
Dockerfile:26
--------------------
  24 |     # $PROFILE_EXT contains all additions made to the bash environment
  25 |     ENV PROFILE_EXT=/etc/profile.d/udi_environment.sh
  26 | >>> RUN touch ${PROFILE_EXT} && chown 10001 ${PROFILE_EXT}
  27 |     
  28 |     USER 10001

It would be nice to have a PR check that checks image build for all arches

[dkwon17]

Yes, I was able to build for the udi for arm64 with this PR, I will investigate

[openshift-merge-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[dkwon17]

Closed in favour of #216