corrected api specs #6629

prkhrkat · 2025-05-30T13:18:09Z

Description

Fixes #

Checklist:

The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
Does this PR requires documentation updates?
I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
I have performed a self-review of my own code.
I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
I have tested it for all user roles.
I have added all the required unit/api test cases.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

github-actions · 2025-06-02T13:01:36Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

sonarqubecloud · 2025-06-02T13:04:41Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

github-actions · 2025-07-25T11:43:10Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

github-actions · 2025-07-25T11:57:53Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

bito-code-review · 2025-07-25T13:52:15Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

bito-code-review · 2025-07-25T13:53:03Z

Bito's AI Code Review trial is almost over
Your free trial of Bito's AI Code Reviews was setup by [email protected] and is nearly over. Let them know if you'd like to continue getting complete reviews.

Sign in to upgrade

About Bito
Merge PRs 89% faster, with 34% fewer regressions, and 87% of relevant PR feedback provided by Bito's AI Code Reviews. Trusted by 100,000+ developers and 1,000+ engineering teams.

github-actions · 2025-07-31T12:44:56Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

gitguardian · 2025-07-31T12:45:08Z

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request

GitGuardian id	GitGuardian status	Secret	Commit	Filename
19465121	Triggered	Generic High Entropy Secret	`15b2a4f`	scripts/sql/34304100_bulk_edit_config.up.sql	View secret

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
Revoke and rotate this secret.
If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider

following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

^{🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.}

gitguardian · 2025-07-31T12:45:08Z

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 3 secrets following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secrets in your pull request

GitGuardian id	GitGuardian status	Secret	Commit	Filename
19465121	Triggered	Generic High Entropy Secret	`15b2a4f`	scripts/sql/34304100_bulk_edit_config.up.sql	View secret
19601641	Triggered	AWS IAM Keys	`f936d8e`	tests/api-spec-validation/reports/live-server-validation-report.md	View secret
19601642	Triggered	GitHub Fine Grained Personal Access Token	`f936d8e`	tests/api-spec-validation/reports/live-server-validation-report.md	View secret

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
Revoke and rotate these secrets.
If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider

following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

^{🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.}

bito-code-review · 2025-07-31T18:12:38Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

github-actions · 2025-08-04T07:30:41Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

bito-code-review · 2025-08-04T08:36:20Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

github-actions · 2025-08-04T21:56:16Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

bito-code-review · 2025-08-04T22:58:12Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

duplicated removed ap spec correction

github-actions · 2025-08-04T23:36:58Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

bito-code-review · 2025-08-05T00:38:18Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

github-actions · 2025-08-05T11:23:43Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

bito-code-review · 2025-08-05T12:26:23Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

api-spec fix api-spec fix api-spec fix API Error wrapper API Error wrapper specs fixes

removed report

github-actions · 2025-08-05T19:51:42Z

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP 404).\n

sonarqubecloud · 2025-08-05T19:55:02Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.5% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

bito-code-review · 2025-08-05T20:56:20Z

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

prkhrkat requested review from vikramdevtron, nishant-d, prakarsh-dt and vivek-devtron as code owners May 30, 2025 13:18

github-actions bot added the PR:Issue-verification-failed label May 30, 2025

corrected api specs

95dfbd0

prkhrkat force-pushed the api-specs branch from 32a430e to 95dfbd0 Compare June 2, 2025 13:01

specs enhance

02eacc9

Merge branch 'develop' into api-specs

d5b9a1c

vikramdevtron previously approved these changes Jul 28, 2025

View reviewed changes

develop-merge

15b2a4f

prkhrkat dismissed vikramdevtron’s stale review via 15b2a4f July 31, 2025 12:44

prkhrkat requested review from pawan-mehta-dt and pawan-59 as code owners July 31, 2025 12:44

corrected specs

cdd8421

prkhrkat added 2 commits August 5, 2025 01:21

spec-fixes as per cursor when ran on results file

8663138

spec-fixes manually for /orchestrator path

f91993f

naming changed from devtron-lab

9c024fa

duplicated removed ap spec correction

specs fixes

f79c59d

prkhrkat added 2 commits August 6, 2025 01:16

api-spec fix

f936d8e

api-spec fix api-spec fix api-spec fix API Error wrapper API Error wrapper specs fixes

Delete live-server-validation-report.md

3a3db67

removed report

corrected api specs #6629

Are you sure you want to change the base?

corrected api specs #6629

Uh oh!

Conversation

prkhrkat commented May 30, 2025

Description

Checklist:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Jul 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Uh oh!

gitguardian bot commented Jul 31, 2025

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Uh oh!

gitguardian bot commented Jul 31, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 3 secrets following the scan of your pull request.

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bito-code-review bot commented Jul 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

gitguardian bot commented Jul 31, 2025 •

edited

Loading