Expand "A note about sigmas" documentation#292
Merged
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
jagerber48
commented
Apr 11, 2025
docs/pages/sigmas.ipynb
Outdated
| @@ -77,6 +91,13 @@ | |||
| "fig = corner.corner(x, quantiles=(0.16, 0.84), levels=(0.68,))\n", | |||
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use the variables defined above
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The documentation in A note about sigmas is somewhat confusing. See #123. This PR spends more words explaining the difference between a confidence region specified directly by a confidence level and a confidence region specified by the distance from the distribution center in units of sigma (for normally distributed data). Attempts are made to show the pros and cons of two approaches, but to not too strongly endorse one approach over the other.