Skip to content

Conversation

gkellogg
Copy link
Collaborator

@gkellogg gkellogg commented Jan 8, 2020

Intent to add support to to/fromRdf using datatype mechanism.

@dlongley please clarify if you do not want to support the "compound literal" mechanism.

@gkellogg gkellogg requested review from davidlehn and dlongley January 8, 2020 00:32
@davidlehn
Copy link
Member

A handful of npm run lint issues need fixing.

@gkellogg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gkellogg commented Jan 8, 2020

A handful of npm run lint issues need fixing.

Yes, that's why it's in-progress, and not ready to go. Mostly, I wanted to get a take on the RDF support considerations.

Note that this doesn't help in making term selection any easier to understand :(.

@dlongley
Copy link
Member

dlongley commented Jan 8, 2020

please clarify if you do not want to support the "compound literal" mechanism.

Yes, we do NOT want to support the "compound literal" mechanism at this time. We only want to support the other mechanism as the one way of doing things with jsonld.js.

@gkellogg gkellogg marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2020 20:19
@davidlehn davidlehn added this to the JSON-LD 1.1 milestone Jan 17, 2020
@gkellogg gkellogg force-pushed the direction branch 2 times, most recently from 57925c3 to 13b3a06 Compare January 25, 2020 23:02
@davidlehn davidlehn merged commit d5d344d into master Jan 29, 2020
@davidlehn davidlehn deleted the direction branch January 29, 2020 00:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants