Skip to content

Conversation

@fitzy101
Copy link
Contributor

We can use our self-hosted action/runner machines to build the amd64 Docker images, falling back to the Github action/runner machines for the arm64 builds.

@fitzy101
Copy link
Contributor Author

That expression is ghastly.

@fitzy101 fitzy101 force-pushed the fitzy/self-hosted-runners branch 3 times, most recently from 7dc80cf to 1d4b0b3 Compare January 22, 2025 04:08
@fitzy101 fitzy101 requested a review from tgxworld January 22, 2025 04:37
We can use our self-hosted action/runner machines to build the amd64
Docker images, falling back to the Github action/runner machines for the
arm64 builds.

Additionally, simplify the expression for how arm runners are selected.
The cost savings from switching to self-hosted runners dwarfs the
increase in 8core vs 2core arm runners.
@fitzy101 fitzy101 force-pushed the fitzy/self-hosted-runners branch from 1d4b0b3 to e72554e Compare January 23, 2025 22:33
@fitzy101 fitzy101 merged commit e72554e into main Jan 23, 2025
1 check passed
@fitzy101 fitzy101 deleted the fitzy/self-hosted-runners branch January 23, 2025 22:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants