Skip to content

bt: Remove unused code#1189

Merged
cjpatton merged 1 commit intomainfrom
cjpatton/947-9-bt
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

bt: Remove unused code#1189
cjpatton merged 1 commit intomainfrom
cjpatton/947-9-bt

Conversation

@cjpatton
Copy link
Collaborator

@cjpatton cjpatton commented Jan 7, 2025

Stacked on #1187.
Partially addresses #947.

This module was written for the Mastic VDAF. Mastic uses a binary tree in two ways: (1) path building from candidate prefixes; and (2) a breadth-first traversal for computing the evaluation proof. None of the functionalities implemented in the bt module support these operations efficiently. Instead, Mastic implements these operations directly.

Remove the unused code from the bt module, leaving only the data types used by Mastic/VIDPF. It may be useful to keep these in their own module, as the data types may eventually be useful for Poplar1/IDPF.

@cjpatton cjpatton marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 22:54
@cjpatton cjpatton requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 22:54
@cjpatton cjpatton changed the base branch from main to cjpatton/947-8-cleanup January 9, 2025 15:58
@cjpatton cjpatton force-pushed the cjpatton/947-8-cleanup branch from cb024c4 to 871ef1c Compare January 16, 2025 18:13
Base automatically changed from cjpatton/947-8-cleanup to main January 16, 2025 18:34
This module was written for the Mastic VDAF. Mastic uses a binary tree
in two ways: (1) path building from candidate prefixes; and (2) a
breadth-first traversal for computing the evaluation proof. None of the
functionalities implemented in the `bt` module support these operations
efficiently. Instead, Mastic implements these operations directly.

Remove the unused code from the `bt` module, leaving only the data types
used by Mastic/VIDPF. It may be useful to keep these in their own
module, as the data types may eventually be useful for Poplar1/IDPF.
@cjpatton cjpatton merged commit 8f0ef77 into main Jan 16, 2025
6 checks passed
@cjpatton cjpatton deleted the cjpatton/947-9-bt branch January 16, 2025 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants