Updated the headings and the information style

[ritikaaaa177]

Description

This PR focuses on headings and information restructuring. I updated the introduction sections as per the tech writing standards.

Type of contribution

• Quick change (typo, broken link, small wording change)
• Standard change (new content, examples, or improvements)
• Substantial change (new feature docs, major restructuring, tutorials)

Related issue

Closes # Related to #

Changes made

• Updated the headings in the Intro.md file
• Updated the context of "What can Doc Detective Do" and "What can't Doc Detective Do"

Testing performed

• Previewed changes locally (npm run start)
• Tested all code examples
• Verified all links work
• Ran build successfully (npm run build)
• Ran style checks with Vale (if applicable)
• Added/updated Doc Detective tests (if applicable)

Screenshots (if applicable)

Checklist

• I have signed the Contributor License Agreement
• My changes follow the contribution guidelines
• I have used the appropriate content template (if applicable)
• All new content files use .mdx extension
• Front matter is included on all new pages
• Links use absolute paths (e.g., /docs/page not ../page)
• Code examples are complete and tested
• I have spell-checked my changes
• I have reviewed my own changes for errors

Additional notes

---

For reviewers:

• See Review Process for guidelines
• Focus on technical accuracy and user value
• Don't block on minor style issues—automation handles those

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated intro page headings: “About Doc Detective,” “Supported Features,” “Current Limitations,” and “Target Audience.”
  • Expanded capability descriptions, noting documentation testing, screenshot generation, and enumerated inspection items.
  • Reworked limitations with clearer section and details; clarified it doesn’t write code and only creates test cases by scanning docs.
  • Expanded audience section with bullet-point examples and use cases.
  • Content-only update with no changes to product behavior.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation content in docs/get-started/intro.md was revised: headings retitled, feature descriptions expanded, limitations clarified, code-writing phrasing adjusted, and audience section extended with examples. No code or behavioral changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Docs: Intro content update docs/get-started/intro.md	Retitled sections; expanded feature list and inspections; replaced limitations note with detailed section; clarified stance on code writing (test-case generation only); broadened target audience with bullet examples. Content-only edits.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers at headings anew,
Hopping through docs with a freshened view.
Features unbundled, limits in sight,
Audience mapped by moonlit byte.
No code to nibble, just words to tend—
A carrot of clarity, friend to friend. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title concisely highlights the primary documentation changes by noting updates to headings and information style, directly reflecting the PR’s focus and enabling quick understanding of the key update.
Description Check	✅ Passed	The pull request description follows the repository template by providing a clear summary, selected contribution type, specific changes, testing steps, and a completed checklist; the only minor issue is the unused placeholder in the “Related issue” section, which can be removed or updated if there are no linked issues, but this does not detract from the overall completeness.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

docs/get-started/intro.md (2)

26-26: Tone/claims: prefer precise, neutral phrasing.
Suggest avoiding “highly creative tool.” Keep claims factual about testing and media capture.

-Doc Detective is a highly creative tool that can perform documentation testing and generate screenshots to support your documentation.
+Doc Detective performs documentation testing and can capture screenshots to support your documentation.

---

1-4: Consider migrating this page to .mdx (project guideline).
The repo guideline says “docs/**/*.md: Do not add .md files; use .mdx instead.” While this is an edit to an existing .md, consider renaming to intro.mdx and updating inbound links to align with the standard.

As per coding guidelines

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b391b6 and 934aad3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/get-started/intro.md (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Do not add .md files for docs; use .mdx instead

Files:

• docs/get-started/intro.md

🧠 Learnings (1)

📚 Learning: 2025-10-06T23:29:55.100Z

Learnt from: CR
PR: doc-detective/doc-detective.github.io#0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-06T23:29:55.100Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.spec.json : Define Doc Detective tests in .spec.json files

Applied to files:

• docs/get-started/intro.md

🔇 Additional comments (4)

docs/get-started/intro.md (4)

18-18: Heading update looks good.
Clear, user-friendly section title.

---

24-24: Section title change is appropriate.
Accurately groups feature content.

---

43-43: Limitation section heading LGTM.
Accurate and clear.

---

55-55: Audience heading LGTM.
Clear and consistent with the new structure.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Grammar: “its” (possessive), not “it’s.”

-Doc Detective has it's own set of limitations.
+Doc Detective has its own set of limitations.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	Doc Detective has it's own set of limitations.
	Doc Detective has its own set of limitations.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/get-started/intro.md around line 45, the phrase "Doc Detective has it's
own set of limitations." uses the contraction "it's" incorrectly; change "it's"
to the possessive "its" so the sentence reads "Doc Detective has its own set of
limitations." to fix the grammar.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Correctness: Doc Detective doesn’t write tests; users define them.
Current sentence implies auto‑generating tests from docs. Tests are defined in .spec.json files and executed by Doc Detective.

-Doc Detective can only write test cases by scanning your documentation; it doesn't write code.
+Doc Detective doesn't write code or generate tests. You define tests (for example, in .spec.json files), and Doc Detective executes them against your product.

Based on learnings

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	Doc Detective can only write test cases by scanning your documentation; it doesn't write code.
	Doc Detective doesn't write code or generate tests. You define tests (for example, in .spec.json files), and Doc Detective executes them against your product.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In docs/get-started/intro.md around line 53, the sentence "Doc Detective can
only write test cases by scanning your documentation; it doesn't write code."
incorrectly implies Doc Detective auto-generates tests from docs; update this
line to state that Doc Detective does not write tests automatically and that
users must define tests in .spec.json files which Doc Detective reads and
executes (i.e., rephrase to clarify that tests are authored by users in
.spec.json and Doc Detective runs them, not that it generates them).

[hawkeyexl]

Thanks for your contribution! We're actively refactoring our Vale rules, so we're holding off on any style-based PRs for the moment. We'll reevaluate once the new rules are in place.

[ritikaaaa177]

Thanks for your contribution! We're actively refactoring our Vale rules, so we're holding off on any style-based PRs for the moment. We'll reevaluate once the new rules are in place.

I have also rephrased some of the explanations, please have a look at those changes.