Skip to content

engine: fix link about init processes #21587

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024
Merged

engine: fix link about init processes #21587

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion content/manuals/build/building/best-practices.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ database, and an in-memory cache in a decoupled manner.

Limiting each container to one process is a good rule of thumb, but it's not a
hard and fast rule. For example, not only can containers be
[spawned with an init process](/manuals/engine/containers/run.md#specify-an-init-process),
[spawned with an init process](/manuals/engine/containers/multi-service_container.md),
some programs might spawn additional processes of their own accord. For
instance, [Celery](https://docs.celeryproject.org/) can spawn multiple worker
processes, and [Apache](https://httpd.apache.org/) can create one process per
Expand Down