Skip to content

feat: Improvements in the DoclingEvalCOCOExporter#149

Merged
nikos-livathinos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
nli/coco_exporter_improvements
Dec 2, 2025
Merged

feat: Improvements in the DoclingEvalCOCOExporter#149
nikos-livathinos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
nli/coco_exporter_improvements

Conversation

@nikos-livathinos
Copy link
Member

Add more fine-grained control in the DoclingEvalCOCOExporter to either export the gt_doc or the pre_doc from the parquet files.

… either export the gt_doc or the

pre_doc from the parquet files.

Signed-off-by: Nikos Livathinos <nli@zurich.ibm.com>
@nikos-livathinos nikos-livathinos self-assigned this Aug 21, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 21, 2025

DCO Check Passed

Thanks @nikos-livathinos, all your commits are properly signed off. 🎉

@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

  • title ~= ^(fix|feat|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\(.+\))?(!)?:

Signed-off-by: Nikos Livathinos <nli@zurich.ibm.com>
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

  • title ~= ^(fix|feat|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\(.+\))?(!)?:

@nikos-livathinos nikos-livathinos merged commit 8f33420 into main Dec 2, 2025
10 checks passed
@nikos-livathinos nikos-livathinos deleted the nli/coco_exporter_improvements branch December 2, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants