Skip to content

Conversation

@ikusakov2
Copy link

Description

Adding a config option to render type names in Apollo-tooling way (only with field names, not type names)

Related # #10561

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Unit testing

Checklist:

  • I have followed the CONTRIBUTING doc and the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2026

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c9113aa

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 9 packages
Name Type
@graphql-codegen/visitor-plugin-common Minor
@graphql-codegen/typescript-document-nodes Patch
@graphql-codegen/gql-tag-operations Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript-operations Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript-resolvers Patch
@graphql-codegen/typed-document-node Patch
@graphql-codegen/typescript Patch
@graphql-codegen/graphql-modules-preset Patch
@graphql-codegen/client-preset Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@ikusakov2 ikusakov2 changed the base branch from master to master-next January 9, 2026 00:12
Copy link
Collaborator

@eddeee888 eddeee888 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing! Thank you!

@eddeee888 eddeee888 merged commit e1d4180 into dotansimha:master-next Jan 11, 2026
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants