Skip to content

Conversation

@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator

@guardrex guardrex commented May 5, 2025

Fixes #35338

Thanks @Rod-at-DOH! 🚀 ... I wasn't able to update the title of the WASM+IIS article to specify "standalone" because the article also has to cover hosted Blazor WebAssembly of .NET 7 or earlier. However .......

  • I'll call out BWAs and Blazor Server apps explicitly for the server-side IIS cross-link.
  • For WASM+IIS, I'm changing the link and the description because the content has shifted slightly. The WASM+IIS coverage is no longer in the overview article. It has its own article now. The description now calls out what's in the dedicated IIS article. Readers could still find this content, but it's best if this link points directly to the new WASM+IIS article with an exact description of what's there.
  • I found some other scenarios with WASM hosting (Azure Static Web Apps, Azure Storage, and GitHub Pages) that can say "standalone" because they don't apply to hosted WASM.

Internal previews

📄 File 🔗 Preview link
aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/index.md aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/index
aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/azure-static-web-apps.md aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/azure-static-web-apps
aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/azure-storage.md aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/azure-storage
aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/github-pages.md aspnetcore/blazor/host-and-deploy/webassembly/github-pages

@guardrex guardrex enabled auto-merge (squash) May 5, 2025 16:16
@guardrex guardrex disabled auto-merge May 5, 2025 16:16
@guardrex guardrex enabled auto-merge (squash) May 5, 2025 16:18
@guardrex guardrex merged commit 781c7b1 into main May 5, 2025
3 checks passed
@guardrex guardrex deleted the guardrex/blazor-wasm-iis branch May 5, 2025 16:22
@guardrex guardrex self-assigned this May 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When configuring deployment, do I choose server-side or WebAssembly?

2 participants