-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
Implement runtime-based IValidatableTypeInfoResolver for minimal API validation #62497
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ef04262
Initial plan
Copilot 8060209
Implement basic RuntimeValidatableTypeInfoResolver with compilation fix
Copilot a09624a
Add comprehensive unit tests for RuntimeValidatableTypeInfoResolver
Copilot 658d475
Add integration tests for RuntimeValidatableTypeInfoResolver registra…
Copilot ee9c087
Update RuntimeValidatableTypeInfoResolverTests to validate actual tes…
Copilot ced54c5
Add more tests and unify resolvers
captainsafia 96751ed
Split RuntimeValidatableInfoResolver into separate parameter and type…
Copilot d0ab1a8
Make RuntimeValidatableTypeInfoResolver public
Copilot 3998440
Add XML documentation to RuntimeValidatableTypeInfoResolver public me…
Copilot 05b5152
Address code review feedback: fix FromService checking, optimize attr…
Copilot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we be checking if the attribute implements
IFromServiceMetadata
instead? That's what we did in #61895Also, if you inherit from either of the attributes these checks would fail, we should be doing something like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed to use
IFromServiceMetadata
interface and handle inheritance properly. Now checks forattr is IFromServiceMetadata || attr is FromKeyedServicesAttribute
to support any attributes that implement the interface or inherit from the specific attribute. Commit 05b5152