-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
Allow arrays of nullable reference types #1386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: draft-v8
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -54,16 +54,13 @@ | |
; | ||
|
||
array_type | ||
: non_array_type rank_specifier+ | ||
: array_type nullable_type_annotation rank_specifier+ | ||
| non_array_type rank_specifier+ | ||
Comment on lines
+57
to
+58
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, no MLR, well done ;-) This change impacts §17.2 which now needs to be revised. |
||
; | ||
|
||
non_array_type | ||
: value_type | ||
| class_type | ||
| interface_type | ||
| delegate_type | ||
| 'dynamic' | ||
| type_parameter | ||
| (class_type | interface_type | delegate_type | 'dynamic' | type_parameter) nullable_type_annotation? | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This fixes the issue where
jnm2 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| pointer_type // unsafe code support | ||
; | ||
|
||
|
@@ -946,13 +943,13 @@ | |
> public void M(string s) | ||
> { | ||
> int length = s.Length; // No warning. s is not null | ||
> | ||
> _ = s == null; // Null check by testing equality. The null state of s is maybe null | ||
> length = s.Length; // Warning, and changes the null state of s to not null | ||
> | ||
> _ = s?.Length; // The ?. is a null check and changes the null state of s to maybe null | ||
> if (s.Length > 4) // Warning. Changes null state of s to not null | ||
> { | ||
> _ = s?[4]; // ?[] is a null check and changes the null state of s to maybe null | ||
> _ = s.Length; // Warning. s is maybe null | ||
> } | ||
|
@@ -1012,7 +1009,7 @@ | |
> { | ||
> var t = new Test(); | ||
> if (t.DisappearingProperty != null) | ||
> { | ||
> int len = t.DisappearingProperty.Length; // No warning. A compiler can assume property is stateful | ||
> } | ||
> } | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has the property that when parsing
string?[][,]?[,,][,,,]?
we end up with twoarray_type
nodes: one beingstring?[][,]?[,,][,,,]
, and one being the innerstring?[][,]
.@Nigel-Ecma It's not mutual left recursion! 😁