Add note about System.NET.Http breaking change #43567
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Since .NET 6/7 are no longer supported, it might just be better to remove System.Net.Http from line 132 and 136. |
Member
Author
@gewarren the nuance here is that in the .NET 8 SDK, System.Net.Http was removed from .NET Framework targeting (eg. net472 targeting). It's still included if you target net8.0 or net9.0. I wasn't sure the best way to include that distinction in the documentation. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
See this customer comment here:
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/https:learnmicrosoftcomen-usdotnet/10787012
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/compatibility/sdk/8.0/implicit-global-using-netfx
I'm not sure how important it is to include the breaking change in the primary documentation so I'll defer to the doc folks but putting this PR out as a proposal.
Internal previews