Skip to content

Conversation

dotnet-policy-service[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Please don't squash-merge this PR.

antonfirsov and others added 2 commits March 8, 2025 16:44
)

The null checking in the code samples is unnecessary and misleading so I'm proposing to delete it. Moreover, we should call out in the remarks section the necessity of a capability check so users avoid walking into an exception in case of missing protocol support.
@ghost ghost added the area-Meta Concerns something that extends across runtime area boundaries, for example, IDisposable. label Mar 10, 2025
Copy link

Learn Build status updates of commit 17a1a93:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
snippets/cpp/VS_Snippets_Remoting/NCLNetInfo2/CPP/networkexamples.cpp ✅Succeeded View
snippets/csharp/System.Net.NetworkInformation/DuplicateAddressDetectionState/Overview/networkexamples.cs ✅Succeeded View
snippets/visualbasic/VS_Snippets_Remoting/NCLNetInfo2/VB/networkexamples.vb ✅Succeeded View
xml/System.Net.NetworkInformation/IPInterfaceProperties.xml ✅Succeeded View
xml/System.Runtime.InteropServices/ImportedFromTypeLibAttribute.xml ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot merged commit 80c0056 into live Mar 10, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area-Meta Concerns something that extends across runtime area boundaries, for example, IDisposable. :octocat: auto-merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants