Skip to content

Conversation

@cincuranet
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #37185.

@cincuranet cincuranet marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 12:19
@cincuranet cincuranet requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2025 12:19
@cincuranet cincuranet requested a review from roji December 1, 2025 12:19
Copy link
Member

@roji roji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good, see comments for some minor fixes.

@cincuranet cincuranet requested a review from roji December 2, 2025 13:23
Copy link
Member

@roji roji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM once comments are adddressed (see specifically that possible inverse logic bug).

@SamMonoRT
Copy link
Member

@cincuranet - confirming this is targetting main and we will backport a fix as necessary.

@cincuranet
Copy link
Contributor Author

cincuranet commented Dec 2, 2025

@SamMonoRT Yes. And for sure we'll backport.

Copy link
Member

@roji roji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Contains fails to fallback to OPENJSON with many parameters in complex queries

3 participants