-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 363
refactor(LookupService): add cache logic for LookupService sample #4891
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR implements caching functionality for the LookupService by introducing a ConcurrentDictionary to store lookup items. The implementation changes the synchronous GetItemsByKey method to an asynchronous GetItemsByKeyAsync method, adding a delay to simulate database access and implementing a cache-first approach for retrieving items. Sequence diagram for GetItemsByKeyAsync methodsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant DemoLookupService
participant Cache
participant Database
Client->>DemoLookupService: GetItemsByKeyAsync(key, data)
DemoLookupService->>Cache: TryGetValue(key)
alt Cache hit
Cache-->>DemoLookupService: Return cached items
else Cache miss
DemoLookupService->>Database: Simulate async delay
Database-->>DemoLookupService: Return items
DemoLookupService->>Cache: TryAdd(key, items)
end
DemoLookupService-->>Client: Return items
File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding a cache invalidation strategy or documentation explaining when/how cached data should be refreshed in a production environment.
- The synchronous GetItemsByKey() method now always returns null - consider either removing it if unused or implementing it consistently with the async version.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4891 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 623 623
Lines 27834 27834
Branches 3990 3990
=========================================
Hits 27834 27834 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
add cache logic for LookupService sample
Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)
简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符;如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号
Description
fixes #4890
Regression?
[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]
[是否影响老版本]
Risk
[Justify the selection above]
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?
☑️ Self Check before Merge
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements: