fix(Checkbox): redesign checkbox style compatible InputGroup

[ArgoZhang]

redesign checkbox style compatible InputGroup

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5165

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

• Fix checkbox style incompatibility with InputGroup.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The checkbox style was redesigned to be compatible with the InputGroup component. The checkbox now renders without a surrounding div when used within an InputGroup, and the InputGroup styles were updated to support the checkbox.

Class diagram showing Checkbox component changes

classDiagram
    class Checkbox {
        +Id: string
        +DisplayText: string
        +Required: bool
        +ShowLabelTooltip: bool
        +Disabled: bool
        +StopPropagation: bool
        +IsShowAfterLabel: bool
        +InputGroup: object
        +OnToggleClick(): void
    }
    note for Checkbox "Simplified rendering structure
Removed RenderCheckbox and RenderLabel fragments"

Loading

State diagram for Checkbox rendering states

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> CheckboxState
    CheckboxState --> WithLabel: ShowLabel is true
    CheckboxState --> WithoutLabel: ShowLabel is false
    WithLabel --> WithTooltip: ShowLabelTooltip is true
    WithLabel --> WithoutTooltip: ShowLabelTooltip is false
    state CheckboxState {
        [*] --> BaseCheckbox
        BaseCheckbox --> AfterLabel: IsShowAfterLabel is true
    }

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Removed the conditional rendering of the checkbox within a div when used inside an InputGroup.	Removed the conditional rendering logic based on the InputGroup property. The checkbox now always renders without a surrounding div.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Checkbox/Checkbox.razor
Updated InputGroup styles to support the checkbox.	Added styles for the .form-check class within an InputGroup. The .form-check class now has padding, border, border-radius, flex-grow, width, min-width, display, align-items, and hover styles.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Input/BootstrapInputGroup.razor.scss

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5165	Ensure correct rendering of TreeView component when placed inside BootstrapInputGroup	✅
#5165	Maintain consistent rendering behavior for dropdown components inside and outside BootstrapInputGroup	✅

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Please provide a more detailed English description of the changes and testing performed. This helps other developers understand and verify the changes.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (278aada) to head (4769460).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5168   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          634       634           
  Lines        28149     28144    -5     
  Branches      4051      4050    -1     
=========================================
- Hits         28149     28144    -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.