feat(BootstrapInputGroupLabel): redesign IsInputGroupLabel logic

[ArgoZhang]

redesign IsInputGroupLabel logic

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5171

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Refactor the IsInputGroupLabel logic to determine whether a label is inside an input group.

Bug Fixes:

• Fix issue feat(BootstrapInputGroupLabel): redesign IsInputGroupLabel logic #5171

Enhancements:

• Simplify the IsInputGroupLabel logic.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The IsInputGroupLabel logic was redesigned to correctly determine if the label is part of an input group, and the component's CSS classes were updated accordingly.

State diagram for BootstrapInputGroupLabel CSS class logic

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> CheckInputGroup
    CheckInputGroup --> IsInputGroupLabel: InputGroup != null
    CheckInputGroup --> NotInputGroupLabel: InputGroup == null

    IsInputGroupLabel --> ApplyInputGroupClasses: Add input-group-text
    NotInputGroupLabel --> ApplyLabelClasses: Add form-label

    state ApplyInputGroupClasses {
        [*] --> AddAlignment
        AddAlignment --> RenderDiv
    }

    state ApplyLabelClasses {
        [*] --> AddAlignment
        AddAlignment --> RenderLabel
    }

    RenderDiv --> [*]
    RenderLabel --> [*]

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Redesigned the logic for determining if a label is part of an input group.	Renamed IsInnerLabel to IsInputGroupLabel to better reflect its purpose. Updated the logic to set IsInputGroupLabel based on whether InputGroup is null. Updated the CSS class to use input-group-text when IsInputGroupLabel is true and form-label when it is false.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Input/BootstrapInputGroupLabel.razor.cs
Updated the component's razor file to use the new IsInputGroupLabel property.	Replaced IsInnerLabel with IsInputGroupLabel in the conditional rendering logic.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Input/BootstrapInputGroupLabel.razor
Updated the sample page to use the new component.	Updated the sample page to use the new component.	src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Sliders.razor

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5171	Redesign the IsInputGroupLabel logic in the BootstrapInputGroupLabel component	✅

Possibly linked issues

• feat(BootstrapInputGroupLabel): redesign IsInputGroupLabel logic #5171: The PR fixes the issue by redesigning the IsInputGroupLabel logic.
• feat(BootstrapInputGroupLabel): redesign IsInputGroupLabel logic #5171: The PR fixes the rendering bug within the BootstrapInputGroup component by redesigning the IsInputGroupLabel logic. The changes in the PR directly address the rendering issue mentioned in the issue description.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1c0f564) to head (338d255).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5172   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          634       634           
  Lines        28139     28138    -1     
  Branches      4049      4049           
=========================================
- Hits         28139     28138    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.