Skip to content

Conversation

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang commented Feb 2, 2025

add AddStyle method

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符;如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5271

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

New Features:

  • Add a new AddStyle method to the CssBuilder class to conditionally add styles based on boolean values or functions.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 2, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces the AddStyle method to the CssBuilder class, enabling the addition of CSS styles.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added the AddStyle method to the CssBuilder class.
  • Added AddStyle method with key and value parameters.
  • Added AddStyle method with conditional logic based on a boolean.
  • Added AddStyle method with conditional logic based on a function that returns a boolean.
  • Added AddStyle method with a function that returns a value.
  • Added AddStyle method with a function that returns a value and a condition.
  • Added AddStyle method to add a nested CssBuilder.
  • Added AddStyle method to add a nested CssBuilder with a condition.
src/BootstrapBlazor/Utils/CssBuilder.cs
Added unit tests for the new AddStyle method.
  • Added unit tests for the AddStyle method with different conditions.
  • Added unit tests for the AddStyle method with nested CssBuilder.
test/UnitTest/Utils/CssBuilderTest.cs
Updated components to use the new AddStyle method.
  • Replaced AddClass with AddStyle for setting style properties.
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Captcha/Captcha.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Drawer/Drawer.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Affix/Affix.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/EditorForm/EditorForm.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Label/BootstrapLabel.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/ValidateForm/ValidateForm.razor.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#5271 Add AddStyle method to CssBuilder

Possibly linked issues


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@bb-auto bb-auto bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 2, 2025
@bb-auto bb-auto bot added this to the v9.3.0 milestone Feb 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Minor typo in test assertions: 'widht' should be 'width' in AddStyle_When test method
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟡 Testing: 2 issues found
  • 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

return this;
}

/// <summary>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (complexity): Consider simplifying the AddStyle overloads by using a parameter object to reduce the number of methods and centralize the logic.

The multiple AddStyle overloads can be simplified into a more maintainable pattern using a parameter object approach. This reduces complexity while maintaining all functionality:

public record StyleOptions
{
    public string Key { get; init; } = "";
    public string? Value { get; init; }
    public Func<string?>? ValueFactory { get; init; }
    public bool? When { get; init; }
    public Func<bool>? WhenFactory { get; init; }
}

public CssBuilder AddStyle(StyleOptions options)
{
    if (ShouldAddStyle(options))
    {
        var value = GetStyleValue(options);
        if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(value))
            stringBuffer.Add($"{options.Key}: {value};");
    }
    return this;
}

// Convenience overload for the most common case
public CssBuilder AddStyle(string key, string? value, bool when = true) => 
    AddStyle(new StyleOptions { Key = key, Value = value, When = when });

private static bool ShouldAddStyle(StyleOptions options) =>
    (options.WhenFactory?.Invoke() ?? options.When ?? true);

private static string? GetStyleValue(StyleOptions options) =>
    options.ValueFactory?.Invoke() ?? options.Value;

This approach:

  • Reduces the number of overloads from 8 to 2
  • Makes the API more extensible for future additions
  • Maintains all current functionality
  • Improves maintainability with centralized logic
  • Keeps the simple cases simple while supporting complex scenarios

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.99%. Comparing base (b479cb1) to head (37653dc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main    #5272      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   99.99%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          639      639              
  Lines        28767    28777      +10     
  Branches      4085     4091       +6     
===========================================
+ Hits         28767    28775       +8     
- Partials         0        2       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang merged commit 3c07dff into main Feb 2, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang deleted the refactor-css branch February 2, 2025 03:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat(CssBuilder): add AddStyle method

2 participants