fix(SelectObject): should not override IsRequired method

[ArgoZhang]

should not override IsRequired method

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5461

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

• Fixes an issue where the IsRequired method was being overridden in SelectObject and SelectTable components, which was causing validation to not work correctly.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request removes the overriding of the IsRequired method in the SelectObject and SelectTable components. This resolves issue #5461.

Updated class diagram for SelectObject component

classDiagram
  class SelectObject {
    -ClearIcon : string
    -ValidateForm : object
    +OnParametersSet()
    +GetClearable() : bool
  }

Loading

Updated class diagram for SelectTable component

classDiagram
  class SelectTable {
    -ClearIcon : string
    -ValidateForm : object
    +OnParametersSet()
    +GetClearable() : bool
    +GetText() : string
  }

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Removed the override of the IsRequired method in SelectObject and SelectTable components.	Removed the IsRequired method override from SelectObject.razor.cs. Removed the IsRequired method override from SelectTable.razor.cs.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Select/SelectObject.razor.cs src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Select/SelectTable.razor.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5461	The SelectObject component should not display a required asterisk when the Required attribute is not set.	✅
#5461	The SelectTable component should not display a required asterisk when the Required attribute is not set.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• bug(SelectObject): 未设置Required时仍然出现必填*号 #5461: PR fixes the issue by removing the IsRequired override that caused the asterisk to always show.
• bug(SelectObject): 未设置Required时仍然出现必填*号 #5461: PR fixes issue by removing IsRequired override in Select components.
• bug(SelectObject): 未设置Required时仍然出现必填*号 #5461: The PR fixes the issue mentioned where IsRequired was overridden causing inconsistency with the Required attribute.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• This looks like a good cleanup, removing unnecessary overrides.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ac2ac31) to head (472cb6c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5464   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          646       646           
  Lines        29358     29356    -2     
  Branches      4131      4131           
=========================================
- Hits         29358     29356    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.