Skip to content

Conversation

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang commented Mar 21, 2025

Link issues

fixes #5679

Summary By Copilot

This pull request includes a small change to the test/UnitTest/Components/SelectTest.cs file. The change modifies the expected value in an assertion within the IsVirtualize_Items_Clearable_Ok test method to ensure it matches the actual value.

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Tests:

  • Updates the expected value in the IsVirtualize_Items_Clearable_Ok test method to match the actual value.

@bb-auto bb-auto bot added the test This is unit test label Mar 21, 2025
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates a unit test to ensure the expected value in an assertion matches the actual value. Specifically, the expected value in the IsVirtualize_Items_Clearable_Ok test method within SelectTest.cs was corrected.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Corrected an assertion in a unit test to match the actual value.
  • Updated the expected value in the Assert.Equal method from "Test2" to "2".
test/UnitTest/Components/SelectTest.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#5679 Update the unit test to ensure it matches the actual value.

Possibly linked issues

  • test(Select): update unit test #5679: The PR fixes the issue by updating the expected value in the IsVirtualize_Items_Clearable_Ok test method to match the actual value, addressing the search box behavior.

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@bb-auto bb-auto bot added this to the v9.4.0 milestone Mar 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • It's great you included a link to the issue this PR addresses.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang merged commit 9c752c8 into main Mar 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang deleted the test-select branch March 21, 2025 09:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (e90bfb6) to head (115771b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5680   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          654       654           
  Lines        29689     29689           
  Branches      4216      4217    +1     
=========================================
  Hits         29689     29689           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test This is unit test

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test(Select): update unit test

2 participants