test(Dialog): improve code coverage

[ArgoZhang]

Link issues

fixes #5871

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

• Yes
• No

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Improve test coverage for Dialog component by adding a new test scenario for nested dialogs

Bug Fixes:

• Introduced a test for the IsHidePreviousDialog option in nested dialog scenarios

Tests:

• Added a test case for Dialog component that checks the behavior of showing a new dialog while hiding the previous dialog

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request improves code coverage for the Dialog component by adding a test case that covers the scenario where a dialog is shown on top of another dialog. The new test case ensures that the previous dialog is hidden when the new dialog is shown.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added a property to hide the previous dialog when a new dialog is shown on top of it.	Added IsHidePreviousDialog = true to the DialogOption when showing a dialog within another dialog.	test/UnitTest/Components/DialogTest.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5871	Increase the code coverage for the Dialog component.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• test(Dialog): improve code coverage #5871: The PR directly addresses the issue by improving code coverage.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• It's great to see you addressing code coverage, but ensure the new test case adds meaningful coverage and isn't just superficially increasing the metric.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (80c2a0f) to head (2e68eb1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main     #5872   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   99.99%   100.00%           
========================================
  Files         661       661           
  Lines       30411     30411           
  Branches     4319      4319           
========================================
+ Hits        30410     30411    +1     
+ Partials        1         0    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.