-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 363
chore(Ajax): update ajax body according method #5881
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
* refactor: 重构代码 * chore: bump version 9.5.11-beta02 --------- Co-Authored-By: AiZhen <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Argo Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThe pull request modifies the ajax.js file to conditionally include a request body based on the HTTP method used. Specifically, it checks if the method is 'PUT' or 'POST' before attempting to serialize and include the request body. This prevents issues with methods like 'GET' or 'DELETE' where a body is not expected. The change also ensures that the body is set to null if no data is provided for 'PUT' or 'POST' requests. Sequence diagram for Ajax request with POST/PUTsequenceDiagram
participant Browser
participant ajax.js
participant Server
Browser->>ajax.js: ajax(url, {method: 'POST'/'PUT', headers, data})
activate ajax.js
ajax.js->>ajax.js: Check method is POST or PUT
alt Method is POST or PUT
ajax.js->>ajax.js: Stringify data to JSON or URLSearchParams
ajax.js->>Server: fetch(url, {method, headers, body: postData})
else Method is not POST or PUT
ajax.js->>Server: fetch(url, {method, headers})
end
activate Server
Server-->>ajax.js: Response
deactivate Server
ajax.js->>Browser: result
deactivate ajax.js
File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider extracting the
fetchOptionsconstruction logic into a separate function for better readability. - It might be clearer to use a
switchstatement instead of anifstatement to check the method type.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Co-Authored-By: AiZhen <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5881 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 661 661
Lines 30412 30412
Branches 4319 4319
=========================================
Hits 30412 30412 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Link issues
fixes #5880
Summary By Copilot
Regression?
Risk
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?
☑️ Self Check before Merge
Summary by Sourcery
Update Ajax module to handle request body more flexibly for different HTTP methods
Enhancements:
Chores: