doc(Reconnector): update support sdk version

[ArgoZhang]

Link issues

fixes #6050

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

• Yes
• No

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Include .NET 9 in the supported SDK versions across reconnectors samples and correct the clearable input demo naming in the Inputs sample.

Bug Fixes:

• Rename the DemoBlock Name attribute from "OnInput" to "IsClearable" in the clearable input sample.

Enhancements:

• Update Reconnectors.razor and BlazorReconnector.razor components to list NET9 in supported SDK versions alongside NET6/NET7/NET8.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This PR updates sample component documentation to include .NET9 support and corrects the input demo block’s Name attribute.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Extend supported .NET version mentions to include NET9 in sample components	Replaced version list in markup paragraphs to include NET9 (plain and HTML-encoded) across samples	src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Reconnectors.razor src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Components/BlazorReconnector.razor
Rename sample input demo block attribute	Changed DemoBlock Name property from OnInput to IsClearable	src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Inputs.razor

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#6050	Update the documentation to reflect the supported SDK versions for the Reconnector component.	✅
#6050	Add sample code for the Reconnector component.	❌	The issue body requests adding sample code for the component, but the PR only updates the supported SDK versions in the documentation. No sample code is added.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates UI samples to include .NET9 support and corrects a demo block identifier.

• Adds “NET9” to the supported SDK version list in reconnect component samples
• Renames the Name attribute for the clearable input demo from OnInput to IsClearable

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Reconnectors.razor	Updated displayed SDK versions to include NET9
src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Inputs.razor	Renamed demo block Name from “OnInput” to “IsClearable”
src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Components/BlazorReconnector.razor	Updated displayed SDK versions to include NET9

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Inputs.razor:227

• [nitpick] Confirm that the Name value matches the actual demo snippet filename (e.g. IsClearable.razor) to ensure the correct sample is loaded.

Name="IsClearable">

[Copilot]

[nitpick] This version-support string is repeated multiple times. Consider extracting the supported SDK versions into a shared constant or resource to avoid manual updates in every sample section.

[Copilot]

[nitpick] Duplicate version text here suggests centralizing the SDK support list (e.g., in a shared constant or localized resource) to keep version updates in sync across components.

Suggested change

	<p>适配移动端支持各种主流浏览器以及移动端，适配 <b>ABP</b>，同时支持 <b>NET6/NET7/NET8/NET9</b></p>
	<p>适配移动端支持各种主流浏览器以及移动端，适配 <b>ABP</b>，同时支持 <b>@SupportedDotNetVersions</b></p>

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1b75d1c) to head (8295b23).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #6051   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          701       701           
  Lines        30958     30958           
  Branches      4378      4378           
=========================================
  Hits         30958     30958           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.