test(ITcpSocketClient): improve code coverage

[ArgoZhang]

Link issues

fixes #6355

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

• Yes
• No

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Improve test coverage for ITcpSocketClient by refactoring the SendAsync catch block to allow distinct logging for cancellation and timeout cases and adding corresponding unit tests.

Enhancements:

• Refactor SendAsync error handling to explicitly separate cancellation and timeout logging branches

Tests:

• Add unit tests to cover cancellation and timeout scenarios in TcpSocketClientBase.SendAsync

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Refactored the handling of OperationCanceledException in TcpSocketClientBase by replacing the inline ternary log call with explicit if/else branches to clearly distinguish cancellation vs. timeout scenarios, improving testability and coverage.

Class diagram for updated TcpSocketClientBase exception handling

classDiagram
    class TcpSocketClientBase {
        +ValueTask<bool> SendAsync(ReadOnlyMemory<byte> data, CancellationToken token)
        -Log(LogLevel, Exception, string)
    }
    TcpSocketClientBase : SendAsync() handles OperationCanceledException
    TcpSocketClientBase : Log() called with different messages for cancellation vs timeout

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Separated cancellation and timeout logging into explicit branches	Removed inline ternary operator in Log call Introduced explicit if/else to check token.IsCancellationRequested Invoked Log with distinct messages for cancellation and timeout	src/BootstrapBlazor/Services/TcpSocket/TcpSocketClientBase.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#6355	Improve code coverage for the ITcpSocketClient class.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• test(ITcpSocketClient): improve code coverage #6355: The PR explicitly fixes issue test(ITcpSocketClient): improve code coverage #6355 and shares the same title, addressing code coverage.
• test(ITcpSocketClient): improve code coverage #6355: The PR links to issue 6355 and includes changes in TcpSocketClientBase.cs, the class mentioned in the issue.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.99%. Comparing base (1afd090) to head (132686b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6356   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.99%   99.99%           
=======================================
  Files         718      718           
  Lines       31572    31607   +35     
  Branches     4461     4461           
=======================================
+ Hits        31571    31606   +35     
  Partials        1        1           

Flag	Coverage Δ
BB	99.99% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.