doc(Socket): add modbus crc-16 validate

[ArgoZhang]

Link issues

fixes #6698

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

• Yes
• No

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Clarify and correct the socket adapter sample to use RemoveDataPackageAdapter for proper callback cleanup

Enhancements:

• Update sample comment to reference RemoveDataPackageAdapter instead of AddDataPackageAdapter for removing callbacks
• Add example RemoveDataPackageAdapter call to demo how to unregister the UpdateReceiveLog callback

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This PR refines the Sockets sample documentation by correcting the data adapter removal workflow and cleaning up formatting in the code-behind, with no functional logic changes.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Clarify and correct data adapter removal in the Sockets sample	Updated comment to reference RemoveDataPackageAdapter instead of AddDataPackageAdapter for removal Added a commented example call _client.RemoveDataPackageAdapter(UpdateReceiveLog);	src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Sockets/Adapters.razor
Remove extraneous blank line in code-behind sample	Deleted a redundant blank line in the OnInitialized override	src/BootstrapBlazor.Server/Components/Samples/Sockets/Adapters.razor.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#6698	Add sample code for Modbus CRC-16 validation to the Socket documentation.	❌	The diff only updates comments and documentation regarding AddDataPackageAdapter and RemoveDataPackageAdapter usage, but does not add any sample code or documentation specifically for Modbus CRC-16 validation as requested in the issue.

Possibly linked issues

• doc(Socket): add modbus crc-16 validate #6698: The PR provides documentation for modbus crc-16 validation, aligning with the issue's request for socket component documentation.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This pull request focuses on documentation improvements for Socket functionality, specifically adding Modbus CRC-16 validation documentation and fixing method references in Socket adapter examples.

• Documentation updates to Socket adapter examples with corrected method names
• Code formatting improvements by removing unnecessary blank lines
• Reordering of using statements for better organization

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
Adapters.razor.cs	Removes unnecessary blank line for cleaner code formatting
Adapters.razor	Updates documentation to reference correct RemoveDataPackageAdapter method instead of AddDataPackageAdapter
BootstrapBlazor.Server.csproj	Reorders using statements to improve organization

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[sourcery-ai]

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (09cb94f) to head (3870e64).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #6699   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          739       739           
  Lines        31706     31706           
  Branches      4462      4462           
=========================================
  Hits         31706     31706           

Flag	Coverage Δ
BB	100.00% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.