Skip to content

Conversation

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang commented Oct 15, 2025

Link issues

fixes #6913

Summary By Copilot

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Make EditorForm support null Model by conditionally rendering only when Model is non-null and update associated tests accordingly.

Bug Fixes:

  • EditorForm no longer throws an exception for a null Model, rendering only the editor container.

Tests:

  • Update Model_Error test to assert empty editor container markup instead of expecting an exception.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 15, 2025 06:51
@bb-auto bb-auto bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 15, 2025
@bb-auto bb-auto bot added this to the 9.11.0 milestone Oct 15, 2025
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR enhances EditorForm to gracefully handle a null Model by wrapping its rendering logic (fields, groups, and buttons) in a null check, and adjusts the unit test to expect an empty form container rather than an exception.

Class diagram for updated EditorForm null model handling

classDiagram
    class EditorForm {
        +object? Model
        +IEnumerable<GroupItem> GroupItems
        +IEnumerable<GroupItem> UnsetGroupItems
        +Func<object?, RenderFragment>? FieldItems
        +RenderFragment? Buttons
        +bool ShowUnsetGroupItemsOnTop
        +IDictionary<string, object>? AdditionalAttributes
        +string ClassString
        +_editorItems
        +RenderGroupItems(GroupItem)
        +RenderUnsetGroupItems
    }
    EditorForm : BootstrapComponentBase
    EditorForm --> "0..1" Model
    EditorForm --> "*" GroupItems
    EditorForm --> "*" UnsetGroupItems
    EditorForm --> "0..1" FieldItems
    EditorForm --> "0..1" Buttons
    EditorForm --> "0..1" AdditionalAttributes
    EditorForm --> "1" ClassString
    EditorForm --> "1" _editorItems
    EditorForm --> "1" RenderGroupItems
    EditorForm --> "1" RenderUnsetGroupItems
Loading

Flow diagram for EditorForm rendering with null model support

flowchart TD
    A["Start rendering EditorForm"] --> B{"Is Model null?"}
    B -- Yes --> C["Render empty form container"]
    B -- No --> D["Render FieldItems with Model"]
    D --> E["Render form body"]
    E --> F{"ShowUnsetGroupItemsOnTop?"}
    F -- Yes --> G["If UnsetGroupItems.Any() then RenderUnsetGroupItems"]
    G --> H["For each GroupItem, RenderGroupItems"]
    F -- No --> I["For each GroupItem, RenderGroupItems"]
    I --> J["If UnsetGroupItems.Any() then RenderUnsetGroupItems"]
    E --> K{"Buttons not null?"}
    K -- Yes --> L["Render Buttons in footer"]
    K -- No --> M["Do not render footer"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Guard EditorForm rendering with null Model check
  • Wrap entire form content inside if (Model != null)
  • Relocate CascadingValue blocks under the null guard
  • Render Buttons only when Model is non-null
  • Leave only the root <div class="bb-editor"> when Model is null
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/EditorForm/EditorForm.razor
Update unit test for null Model behavior
  • Change Model_Error test to render the component instead of throwing
  • Capture component output (cut) and assert its Markup
  • Expect <div class="bb-editor"></div> as the null-model fallback
test/UnitTest/Components/EditorFormTest.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#6913 Ensure EditorForm does not render its content when the model is null.
#6913 Update tests to verify that EditorForm renders nothing (or an empty container) when the model is null.

Possibly linked issues


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang enabled auto-merge (squash) October 15, 2025 06:51
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds null-checking support for the Model property in the EditorForm component to prevent potential null reference exceptions. The change wraps the entire component content in a conditional block that only renders when Model is not null.

Key Changes

  • Added null check wrapper around EditorForm component content to handle null Model scenarios

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

sourcery-ai[bot]
sourcery-ai bot previously approved these changes Oct 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ed838ba) to head (7934e94).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #6914   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          739       739           
  Lines        31773     31776    +3     
  Branches      4467      4468    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits         31773     31776    +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
BB 100.00% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member Author

@sourcery-ai review

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • The test named Model_Error should be renamed to reflect that a null model now renders an empty form instead of throwing.
  • Consider extracting the repeating RenderGroupItems/RenderUnsetGroupItems logic into a helper to flatten the nested branches and reduce duplication.
  • Clarify whether the editor footer buttons should still render when Model is null, since they’re currently skipped inside the null check.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The test named Model_Error should be renamed to reflect that a null model now renders an empty form instead of throwing.
- Consider extracting the repeating RenderGroupItems/RenderUnsetGroupItems logic into a helper to flatten the nested branches and reduce duplication.
- Clarify whether the editor footer buttons should still render when Model is null, since they’re currently skipped inside the null check.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang merged commit 605aca1 into main Oct 15, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang deleted the feat-editor branch October 15, 2025 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat(EditorForm): support null model

2 participants