-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 324
With Buildkit, don't pull docker images needlessly. #360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
neil-ach
wants to merge
2
commits into
drone-plugins:master
Choose a base branch
from
neil-ach:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could we remove the above for loop, and instead move this logic into a helper function? I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the
ifstatementalso might be good to comment the logic so folks unfamiliar with buildkit can follow the code. thanks!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Buildkit (when available and enabled) uses the inline cache information to pull only the relevant subset of cache, which is in general more efficient than unconditionally pulling the entire image in the hopes that some of it will trigger cache hits.
For the above to work, we need Buildkit enabled (DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1) AND Buildkit inline cache enabled (BUILDKIT_INLINE_CACHE=1) AND cache-from set to a valid image (with inline cache metadata present).
However, right now if this plugin sees the cache-from argument set, it will add the pre-pull of the image step, and that makes the more efficient Buildkit inline cache useless, because all of the cache is already fetched, useful or not. This is the part that we want to change. We never want to remove the cache-from directive if it was passed, we want to skip the image pre-pull when we know that it will be counterproductive (the above outlined scenario).
I don't mind adding some more documentation, although this PR combined with the commit message should serve as pretty in depth documentation at this point.
Thanks.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the explanation. let's split the code into a helper function similar to the pseudo-code in my comment, with any changes that you feel are needed to make it accurate, and then we can get this merged