Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Sep 18, 2025

  • Analyze repository structure and existing integration test patterns
  • Identify the missing integration test for Test-SqlDscIsRole command
  • Study existing similar tests (Test-SqlDscIsAgentOperator) and role-related tests pattern
  • Understand build and test workflow requirements
  • Create Test-SqlDscIsRole.Integration.Tests.ps1 following established patterns
  • Add the new test file to appropriate pipeline group (Group 5 with other role tests)
  • Verify the test follows SqlServerDsc guidelines and style requirements
  • Run unit tests to ensure changes don't break existing functionality
  • Update CHANGELOG.md with the addition
  • Address review feedback:
    • Fix file ending with single blank line per guidelines
    • Change error message to reference 'noop' task instead of 'build'
    • Update README.md with Test-SqlDscIsRole dependency information

Review Feedback Addressed:

File format compliance - Fixed file to end with single blank line per project guidelines
Error message correction - Updated error message to reference correct 'noop' task
Documentation update - Added Test-SqlDscIsRole to integration test dependencies table in README.md with:

  • Run order: 2
  • Dependencies: 1 (Install-SqlDscServer), 0 (Prerequisites)
  • Instance: DSCSQLTEST
  • Creates no persistent objects

The integration test provides comprehensive coverage for real-world SQL Server environments while leveraging the existing test infrastructure and shared test roles.

Fixes #2229.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.


This change is Reviewable

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Integration test missing for Test-SqlDscIsRole Add integration test for Test-SqlDscIsRole command Sep 18, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from johlju September 18, 2025 10:35
Copilot AI requested a review from johlju September 18, 2025 17:31
@johlju johlju marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2025 17:36
@johlju johlju requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2025 17:36
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@johlju johlju left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

@johlju reviewed 2 of 3 files at r2, 2 of 2 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @copilot)

@johlju johlju merged commit efabbdc into main Sep 18, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
@johlju johlju deleted the copilot/fix-2229 branch September 18, 2025 19:07
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94%. Comparing base (371314d) to head (4c10269).
⚠️ Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##           main   #2262   +/-   ##
====================================
  Coverage    94%     94%           
====================================
  Files       149     149           
  Lines      9163    9163           
====================================
  Hits       8687    8687           
  Misses      476     476           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 94% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Integration test missing for Test-SqlDscIsRole

2 participants