-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
set file's trashed attribute to true instead of permanently removing it
#178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
robeeeert
wants to merge
7
commits into
dsoprea:master
Choose a base branch
from
robeeeert:fix-file-deletion
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d6a1181
set file's attribute to true instead of permanently removing it
robeeeert 68e1b3a
use APIv2 syntax for trashing a file
robeeeert 1d3fb58
introduce delete_to_trash mount variable to switch between file trash…
robeeeert ed2174d
fix string comparison by using == instead of is
robeeeert 28b9697
remove TODO comment
robeeeert a07613a
create delegate method that either calls remove_entry or trash_entry …
robeeeert 2b6fc66
move delegation method into own module gdutility and rename it to sma…
robeeeert File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should modify the existing function (
remove_entry). We should be adding a new function calledtrash_entry. These hit two different APIs. Just update the existing references fromremove_entrytotrash_entry. Thanks. We're almost there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But then I have to check for delete_to_trash before every call to remove_entry. Shouldn't we then have something like a delegate function that either calls remove_entry or trash_entry based on the variable's value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm tempted to agree, but two points I'd like to make:
Please create a "gdutility" module in the same package (path) with a class called "GdUtility" and add a method called "smart_delete" that calls the appropriate method.