Update benchmark for R-arrow 20.0.0.2 on c6id.metal#116
Merged
Tmonster merged 2 commits intoduckdblabs:mainfrom Jun 10, 2025
Merged
Update benchmark for R-arrow 20.0.0.2 on c6id.metal#116Tmonster merged 2 commits intoduckdblabs:mainfrom
Tmonster merged 2 commits intoduckdblabs:mainfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Hi Thanks for the PR! |
Author
|
Thanks @Tmonster, much appreciated. |
Collaborator
|
thanks! Will publish later today as well |
Author
|
Awesome, thanks @Tmonster. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello! In Arrow 20, some notable improvements were made to our table join implementation in terms of speed and memory requirements so I wanted to update the benchmarks using the latest version.
I wasn't able to use the included scripts as-is to set up my EC2 instance but I think I was able to get close enough by referencing them. I also wasn't able to preview the results due to errors but I did poke around the CSVs and I think the we don't OOM on some of the questions we currently do. I'd love to see what the results look like now.
Let me know if I can add anything else here.