-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
feature frontend dependencies #287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
1454c76
to
1e05955
Compare
fix(review): bump semver in packag.json from pom.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,2469 @@ | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't package-lock.json
be in the .gitignore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
short answer no
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then I 'd like to restate my concern with the double definition of the same version configuration ...
@duncdrum Happy to help with the XQSuite tests, do you have some tests? |
@adamretter they are in |
this PR removes most (ace is a nightmare and on its way out see #141) frontend dependencies on shared-resources, and incorporates tracking and building js dependencies via maven.
This goes along with a minor version upgrade to bootstrap and jQuery ootb. This is to facilitate further work on the redesign of the documentation app (and taking shared-resources out of the loop as much as possible for now).
@adamretter please take a look at the js tests, and let me know if there is anything i can do to add the xqsuite tests in a similar manner.