-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
Also test against Java 17 #905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@adamretter With #904 merged, this is ready for a rebase. |
…), and eXist-db 7.x.x (Java 17)
72cfcb4
to
36ae30f
Compare
@joewiz Okay I have rebased. Unfortunately I am now seeing a failure that is unrelated to this PR, which seems to be related to formatting of content of the documentation. I am not sure where that came from. The failure is this:
I am afraid that I have absolutely no idea what that is or what is meant by |
@adamretter these test failures were introduced by #872 which you cleaned up see #928 |
cleanup automatically close #905
@duncdrum Possibly, yes. But I have no idea what these errors mean or how to fix them. There simply isn't enough information... do you know? |
@adamretter see #928 the XQS test returns the list of documents, where xml as string literal appears inside |
@adamretter I didn't close it directly. I think it was closed automatically when I merged #929. That PR contained a commit whose commit message stated:
|
@duncdrum I am confused why you asked me to do this work, and then you simultaneously did it yourself? Seems we have duplicated and wasted time and effort here :-( |
@adamretter the Java 17 changes are unrelated to the faulty programmlistings which @joewiz fixed in the meantime. |
I didn't mean to cause duplicate work. |
Test against the version of Java for eXist-db 6.x.x (Java 8), and eXist-db 7.x.x (Java 17).
Requires #904 to be merged first.