Skip to content

Conversation

@jonahgraham
Copy link
Member

Part of #1405

@jonahgraham
Copy link
Member Author

@jld01 I am pretty sure this is ok, but as you have been in the llvm bundles recently perhaps you know of some use here that I am not aware of.

@jonahgraham jonahgraham requested a review from jld01 January 6, 2026 14:56
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Test Results

4 718 tests  ±0   4 709 ✅ ±0   2m 33s ⏱️ -2s
  182 suites ±0       9 💤 ±0 
  182 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 4898c97. ± Comparison against base commit 3f6b56c.

@jld01
Copy link
Contributor

jld01 commented Jan 6, 2026

@jld01 I am pretty sure this is ok, but as you have been in the llvm bundles recently perhaps you know of some use here that I am not aware of.

I think removal of the UML-related content is fine, @jonahgraham.

Copy link
Member

@ruspl-afed ruspl-afed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants