First version of initializer support for 'to' block#186
Merged
agarciadom merged 3 commits intomainfrom Jun 12, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Looks like I'm failing some tests. I'll work a bit more on this PR later. |
Contributor
Author
|
The PR is now passing all tests - @kolovos can you check it? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #125.
I had a first try at supporting initializer expressions in the
topart of an ETL rule. I've tried implementing the change in the grammar, unparser, default strategy, and fast strategy, and created a test around this transformation:Let me know if I've missed anything :-).