Skip to content

Conversation

@Christopher-Hermann
Copy link
Contributor

The styling is done in another Thread by asyncExe anyways, there is no need to do this in an Job. This overhead can be avoided.

The styling is done in another Thread by asyncExe anyways, there is no need to do this in an Job. This overhead can be avoided.
@vogella
Copy link
Contributor

vogella commented Jan 8, 2025

I guess the old implementation followed the good old German "doppelt hält besser" approach. ;-)

Thanks for this change, LGTM

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Test Results

 1 818 files  ±0   1 818 suites  ±0   1h 36m 6s ⏱️ + 4m 55s
 7 732 tests ±0   7 504 ✅ ±0  228 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
24 357 runs  ±0  23 608 ✅ ±0  749 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 665d3dc. ± Comparison against base commit 650413a.

@Christopher-Hermann Christopher-Hermann merged commit 690fac0 into eclipse-platform:master Jan 8, 2025
17 checks passed
@Christopher-Hermann Christopher-Hermann deleted the stickyJob branch January 8, 2025 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants