Improvement: Process requirements alignment #99
Conversation
aschemmel-tech
force-pushed
the
aschemmel-tech-process-req-table
branch
from
66a75f9 to
b8f0d35
Compare
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
masc2023
left a comment
masc2023
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Checked only CHM, PRM, TLM and general, gave some comments about draft and priority
| :id: gd_req__change__attr_affected_wp | ||
| :status: valid | ||
| :tags: chm, attribute, mandatory | ||
| :status: draft |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why is that draft? I assume, that we have an impact analysis tool, which gives us affected elements and thus indirectly also the work products to enter her?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I set this to draft, because from the description I could not several questions: Shall it be manual/automated? As a (new) Feature Request is also a Change Request, what would I put here? ... So I think it could not be implemented without refinement.
| :id: gd_req__change__tool_impact_analysis | ||
| :status: valid | ||
| :tags: chm, check, tool | ||
| :tags: prio_3_automation, check, tool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why Prio 3, would assume that is good to show in audit, how we can do impact analysis with that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As you say "is good" - but I would expect we can pass the audit without this. And also expect significant effort if we cannot take over an existing tool.
process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_process_reqs.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
MaximilianSoerenPollak
left a comment
MaximilianSoerenPollak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had some questions / comments
process/process_areas/architecture_design/guidance/architecture_process_reqs.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/guidance/requirements_process_reqs.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/guidance/requirements_process_reqs.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
process/process_areas/requirements_engineering/guidance/requirements_process_reqs.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_process_reqs.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ref: Resolves: #98
aschemmel-tech
force-pushed
the
aschemmel-tech-process-req-table
branch
from
b8f0d35 to
5c0c0e9
Compare
Ref: Resolves: #98
aschemmel-tech
force-pushed
the
aschemmel-tech-process-req-table
branch
from
9f29519 to
76f5db9
Compare
MaximilianSoerenPollak
left a comment
MaximilianSoerenPollak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks okay from tooling team side.
Ref: Resolves: #98