Skip to content

[Tuning] Lateral Movement Rules#4736

Merged
Samirbous merged 7 commits intomainfrom
Samirbous-patch-3
May 21, 2025
Merged

[Tuning] Lateral Movement Rules#4736
Samirbous merged 7 commits intomainfrom
Samirbous-patch-3

Conversation

@Samirbous
Copy link
Contributor

@Samirbous Samirbous commented May 20, 2025

addresses some of the reported FNs/misses by Peter via our community slack channel:

  • Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (removed network.protocol condition (missing in events and causes FNs)
  • Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (removed network.protocol condition (missing in events and causes FNs)
  • Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI - bump up severity to high
  • WMI Incoming Lateral Movement- bumped up maxspan to 20s and replaced TCP random high port by 135 (RPC)

@Samirbous Samirbous self-assigned this May 20, 2025
@Samirbous Samirbous added Rule: Tuning tweaking or tuning an existing rule OS: Windows windows related rules labels May 20, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Rule: Tuning - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when tuning an existing rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the suggested changes.
  • Provide example JSON data or screenshots.
  • Provide evidence of reducing benign events mistakenly identified as threats (False Positives).
  • Provide evidence of enhancing detection of true threats that were previously missed (False Negatives).
  • Provide evidence of optimizing resource consumption and execution time of detection rules (Performance).
  • Provide evidence of specific environment factors influencing customized rule tuning (Contextual Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improvements made by modifying sensitivity by changing alert triggering thresholds (Threshold Adjustments).
  • Provide evidence of refining rules to better detect deviations from typical behavior (Behavioral Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improvements of adjusting rules based on time-based patterns (Temporal Tuning).
  • Provide reasoning of adjusting priority or severity levels of alerts (Severity Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improving quality integrity of our data used by detection rules (Data Quality).
  • Ensure the tuning includes necessary updates to the release documentation and versioning.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • updated_date matches the date of tuning PR merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive. Review to ensure the original intent of the rule is maintained.

Testing and Validation

  • Validate that the tuned rule's performance is satisfactory and does not negatively impact the stack.
  • Ensure that the tuned rule has a low false positive rate.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ✅ Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI (eql)
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ✅ Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI (eql)
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ WMI Incoming Lateral Movement (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 20, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ✅ Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI (eql)
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via PowerShell Remoting (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ WMI Incoming Lateral Movement (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 21, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ✅ Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI (eql)
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via PowerShell Remoting (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ WMI Incoming Lateral Movement (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 21, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via PowerShell Remoting (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ WMI Incoming Lateral Movement (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented May 21, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Suspicious Cmd Execution via WMI (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via WinRM Remote Shell (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ Incoming Execution via PowerShell Remoting (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta
  • ❌ WMI Incoming Lateral Movement (eql)
    • stack_validation_failed: no_alerts - 0 alerts

@Samirbous Samirbous merged commit 2c2b3e7 into main May 21, 2025
12 checks passed
@Samirbous Samirbous deleted the Samirbous-patch-3 branch May 21, 2025 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport: auto Domain: Endpoint OS: Windows windows related rules Rule: Tuning tweaking or tuning an existing rule

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants