Skip to content

Conversation

Aegrah
Copy link
Contributor

@Aegrah Aegrah commented Oct 15, 2025

Summary

Rule tuning based on community issue #5226.

The old version of sudo that is susceptible for this attack, has the option to call --chroot=directory, which was currently not part of the query due to the usage of the in operator. This was changed in this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Rule: Tuning - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when tuning an existing rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the suggested changes.
  • Provide example JSON data or screenshots.
  • Provide evidence of reducing benign events mistakenly identified as threats (False Positives).
  • Provide evidence of enhancing detection of true threats that were previously missed (False Negatives).
  • Provide evidence of optimizing resource consumption and execution time of detection rules (Performance).
  • Provide evidence of specific environment factors influencing customized rule tuning (Contextual Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improvements made by modifying sensitivity by changing alert triggering thresholds (Threshold Adjustments).
  • Provide evidence of refining rules to better detect deviations from typical behavior (Behavioral Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improvements of adjusting rules based on time-based patterns (Temporal Tuning).
  • Provide reasoning of adjusting priority or severity levels of alerts (Severity Tuning).
  • Provide evidence of improving quality integrity of our data used by detection rules (Data Quality).
  • Ensure the tuning includes necessary updates to the release documentation and versioning.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • updated_date matches the date of tuning PR merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive. Review to ensure the original intent of the rule is maintained.

Testing and Validation

  • Validate that the tuned rule's performance is satisfactory and does not negatively impact the stack.
  • Ensure that the tuned rule has a low false positive rate.

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Oct 15, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential CVE-2025-32463 Sudo Chroot Execution Attempt (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@tradebot-elastic
Copy link

tradebot-elastic commented Oct 17, 2025

⛔️ Test failed

Results
  • ❌ Potential CVE-2025-32463 Sudo Chroot Execution Attempt (eql)
    • coverage_issue: no_rta
    • stack_validation_failed: no_rta

@Aegrah Aegrah merged commit a3cb002 into main Oct 17, 2025
13 checks passed
@Aegrah Aegrah deleted the cve-2025-32463-tuning branch October 17, 2025 07:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants