You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Then enroll and run an {{agent}}. You’ll need an enrollment token and the URL of the {{fleet-server}}. You can use the default enrollment token for your policy or create new policies and [enrollment tokens](/reference/fleet/fleet-enrollment-tokens.md) as needed.
@@ -119,15 +119,15 @@ By default {{private-location}}s are configured to allow two simultaneous browse
119
119
120
120
It is critical to allocate enough memory and CPU capacity to handle configured limits. Resource requirements will vary depending on simultaneous workload and monitor complexity:
121
121
122
-
**For browser monitors**: Start by allocating at least 2 GiB of memory and two cores _per browser instance_ to ensure consistent performance and avoid out-of-memory errors. Then adjust as needed.
122
+
**For browser monitors**: Start by allocating at least 2 GiB of memory and two cores _per browser instance_ to ensure consistent performance and avoid out-of-memory errors. Then adjust as needed.
123
123
**For tcp, http, icmp**: Much less memory is needed, start by allocating at least 512MiB of memory and two cores _globally_. While this will be enough to run a large number of lightweight monitors, it is recommended to track the resource usage and adjust accordingly.
124
124
125
125
Example: For a private location expected to run 2 concurrent browser monitors and 100 HTTP checks, the recommended allocation is 2 * (2 GiB + 2 vCPU) + (512 MiB + 2 vCPU) => 4,5 GiB + 6 vCPU.
126
126
127
127
### Known limitations on vertical scaling
128
128
129
129
- A single private location will not scale beyond 10,000 monitors. Exceeding this number will result in agent degradation and inconsistent execution, regardless of the resources allocated.
130
-
- Complex monitor configuration can disproportionately increase the private location policy size, leading to agent communication errors and degradation even if the limit mentioned above hasn't been reached.
130
+
- Complex monitor configuration can disproportionately increase the private location policy size, leading to agent communication errors and degradation even if the limit mentioned above hasn't been reached.
131
131
132
132
If you're facing one of these scenarios, it is likely that the private location has grown too large and needs to be split into smaller locations, each alloted a portion of the original location monitors.
0 commit comments