Skip to content

Conversation

carsonip
Copy link
Member

@carsonip carsonip commented Apr 25, 2025

⚠️ HOLD FOR 9.1 ⚠️

Document sampling.tail.ttl config

Related to #769
Part of elastic/apm-server#13525

@carsonip carsonip requested a review from colleenmcginnis May 6, 2025 13:15
@carsonip carsonip marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2025 13:15
@carsonip carsonip requested a review from simitt May 6, 2025 13:15
Copy link
Member Author

@carsonip carsonip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we should hold off from merging it until 9.1 and 8.19 release, because having these unreleased versions in public docs can be confusing.

Copy link
Contributor

@colleenmcginnis colleenmcginnis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, but if you don't want this to be published until 9.1 you should hold off on merging as you mentioned.

(Spoiler: We're working on some changes to how to handle PRs like this that contain content for future versions and how to annotate version applicability of individual settings. If these features are available in docs-builder before the 9.1 release, I'll make updates here.)

@carsonip carsonip requested review from a team as code owners May 21, 2025 15:58
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@carsonip carsonip enabled auto-merge (squash) July 28, 2025 15:46
Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@carsonip carsonip merged commit 337ac58 into elastic:main Jul 29, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants