Skip to content

Conversation

ketkee-aryamane
Copy link
Contributor

@ketkee-aryamane ketkee-aryamane commented Jul 15, 2025

DO NOT MERGE THIS PR UNTIL 9.1 / 8.19 RELEASE DAY

Linked to https://github.com/elastic/developer-docs-team/issues/313
Added versions 8.19 and 9.1 to the table listing support for cross cluster search. The following screenshot gives a preview of the change.

Added the 'applies_to' tag to signify GA for 9.1.

FireShot Capture 007 - Cross-cluster search - Elastic Docs -  localhost

@ketkee-aryamane ketkee-aryamane requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2025 06:52
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 15, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

Copy link
Contributor

@eedugon eedugon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for handling this!
We need to make some adjustments, let me know if you believe I've missed anything!

Copy link
Contributor

@leemthompo leemthompo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for jumping on this @ketkee-aryamane! First off, the table is awful to work with 🤣 and there's additional complexity because 8.18 wasn't 8.last.

Looking at the new table, it does look like we've introduced an error here: it now states that a local 9.0 is not compatible with a remote 8.18. This contradicts the explicit example text "For example, a local 9.0 cluster can search a remote 8.18 or any remote 9.x cluster. "

Copy link
Contributor

@eedugon eedugon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's still a pending change that I've added in a comment.

About the note I think we should update the link and not linking to the github page of Elasticsearch from our official docs. If feels really weird. But I'm not sure where to link at the moment.

@ketkee-aryamane ketkee-aryamane requested a review from naj-h July 24, 2025 14:43
Copy link

@naj-h naj-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left a comment on the missing references

| 8.18 | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![Yes](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-yes.png "") | ![Yes](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-yes.png "") | ![Yes](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-yes.png "") |
| 9.0 | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![No](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-no.png "") | ![Yes](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-yes.png "") | ![Yes](https://doc-icons.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/icon-yes.png "") |

| Local cluster version | 7.17 | 8.0 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 8.10 | 8.11 | 8.12 | 8.13 | 8.14 | 8.15 | 8.16 | 8.17 | 8.18 | 8.19 | 9.0 | 9.1 |
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ketkee-aryamane I think the table is missing some references. E.g. a local 8.19 is listed as incompatible with a remote on 9.1, 8.x would be compatible with a remote on 8.19.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @naj-h following is the updated table, where I do see that 8.19 is listed as compatible with a remote on 9.1, 8.x compatible with a remote on 8.19.

image

Copy link

@naj-h naj-h Jul 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should remove local 9.0 with remote 8.19
There are some paths that appear are unsupported in the table, for which we're going to double-check, but this might be something we change in the doc in the future, even after the release is out, so i'm good with merging this table (after removing local 9.0 with remote 8.19)

@ketkee-aryamane ketkee-aryamane removed the request for review from charlotte-hoblik July 29, 2025 17:29
@ketkee-aryamane ketkee-aryamane merged commit f78862e into main Jul 29, 2025
8 checks passed
@ketkee-aryamane ketkee-aryamane deleted the 313-add-ccs-support branch July 29, 2025 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants