-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
Refer to serverless project feature tiers as such and not as subscription nor features #3249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refer to serverless project feature tiers as such and not as subscription nor features #3249
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good on the Observability side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one small comment around positioning feature tier upgrades to take or leave
solutions/observability/observability-serverless-feature-tiers.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My sections LGTM
…tion nor features (elastic#3249) This PR streamlines the way we refer to serverless feature tiers in the docs: - Feature tier names should be written in full form - A feature tier isn't a subscription. This term is reserved on Elastic Cloud, it refers to the Elastic Cloud subscription that determines ECH deployment features and the support level for both ECH deployments and serverless projects. Any non-trial user on Elastic Cloud needs an Elastic Cloud subscription regardless of their usage of ECH or serverless. - we should consistently use "feature tier" when we need this term. Not just feature, not just tier (though just tier sounds more acceptable) - It's fine to say "Security Analytics Essentials project" too. We don't have to overuse "feature tier" Closes: elastic#2768 --------- Co-authored-by: shainaraskas <[email protected]>
This PR streamlines the way we refer to serverless feature tiers in the docs:
Closes: #2768