Skip to content

Conversation

@kunisen
Copy link
Contributor Author

kunisen commented Oct 17, 2025

Hi @eedugon @AlexP-Elastic @dtuck9 @maggieghamry

I requested your kind review from doc, dev and support perspective.
Please refer to this comment about the change details and thank you!

@kunisen kunisen self-assigned this Oct 17, 2025
@kunisen kunisen added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation supportability ability enable self-service or support of product Team:Admin Issues owned by the Admin Docs Team labels Oct 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@eedugon eedugon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome improvements in my opinion.
Really worthy.

In some way I think we shouldn't even mention (or support) the possibility of certificates with static SAN entries, but I'm ok with this text.

kunisen and others added 4 commits October 17, 2025 19:01
…stallation/manage-security-certificates.md

Co-authored-by: Edu González de la Herrán <[email protected]>
Copy link

@AlexP-Elastic AlexP-Elastic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me, had a few minor comments but nothing blocking


For this reason, using a wildcard DNS certificate is recommended over a certificate with static SAN entries, as it provides a more scalable, performant, and operationally safe solution.

### Operational cost perspective

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need 3 sections here to expand on the sentence above?

Who are you trying to convince - pretty sure everyone who is allowed to use a wildcard cert will do so :)

I think I'd probably just add

a static SAN certificate requires reissuing the certificate whenever a new deployment is created and updating the SAN list for all clusters and applications (Elasticsearch, Kibana, etc.), which increases operational overhead.

and

We suggest configuring your wildcard DNS certificate as a subdomain (e.g., *.ece.mycompany.com). Doing so significantly reduces security risks associated with certificate misconfigurations.

to the section above

I don't feel super strongly about this though

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @AlexP-Elastic!

The request comes from past cases from customers and the discussion with @eedugon that we felt it doesn't harm to make it super clear that "why in specific do we highly recommend wildcard DNS certs". We had multiple customers / users asking details about security risk, operational cost related questions, and Edu shared the insights about the performance considerations too, which eventually and logically it split into 3 sections.

I will leave this to @eedugon and @maggieghamry to make the decision :) If they could help confirm that the simplified content is easily and visibly understandable enough for customers, then I am perfectly fine with we remove the headings and describe the context in one paragraph.

@eedugon @maggieghamry please help provide your kind insights on this 🙏 and thanks again!

@eedugon
Copy link
Contributor

eedugon commented Oct 18, 2025

@kunisen , I think there's a middle point, as in some way we don't need to highlight all this that much with a big H2 section and 3 x H3.

On Monday I will quickly prepare a proposal through a suggestion so you can take a look and evaluate. The suggestion will:

  • Change the name of Wildcard DNS certificate vs static SAN certificate H2 section and convert it to H3.
  • Convert the final 3 sections Operational cost perspective, Performance perspective, and Security perspective to bullets with a bit shorter explanations on each, but keeping the esence.

I agree the 3 big sub-sections at the end don't add value and it makes the doc scope to not be totally clear.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation supportability ability enable self-service or support of product Team:Admin Issues owned by the Admin Docs Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants