Skip to content

[Obs AI Assistant] Add Llama 4 Maverick model ratings to the LLM performance matrix #3825

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 6, 2025
Merged

[Obs AI Assistant] Add Llama 4 Maverick model ratings to the LLM performance matrix #3825

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ced6365
added llama 4 Maveric
yuliia-fryshko Nov 5, 2025
fab1ea6
fixed typo
yuliia-fryshko Nov 5, 2025
65ea634
updated the performance of llama 4
yuliia-fryshko Nov 6, 2025
7cb8bfb
edited model name for the consistensy
yuliia-fryshko Nov 6, 2025
9ecdc7d
Merge branch 'main' into obs-ai-assistant-added-llama-4-maveric-perfo…
viduni94 Nov 6, 2025
597506c
Merge branch 'main' into obs-ai-assistant-added-llama-4-maveric-perfo…
yuliia-fryshko Nov 6, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions solutions/observability/llm-performance-matrix.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Models you can [deploy and manage yourself](/solutions/observability/connect-to-
| OpenAI | **gpt-oss-20b** | Poor | Poor | Great | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | Good |
| OpenAI | **gpt-oss-120b** | Excellent | Poor | Great | Great | Excellent | Good | Good | Excellent |
| Meta | **Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct** | Excellent | Good | Great | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good | Excellent |
| Meta | **Llama-4-Maverick-17B** | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good | Great |
Copy link
Contributor

@viduni94 viduni94 Nov 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's stick to the HugginFace model name for consistency.

Suggested change
| Meta | **Llama-4-Maverick-17B** | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good | Great |
| Meta | **Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct** | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good | Great |

Copy link
Contributor

@viduni94 viduni94 Nov 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of the results are very different to llama 3.3 - Did you run into the token limit issue a lot ?

Copy link
Contributor

@viduni94 viduni94 Nov 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The screenshot says Excellent for contextual insights, but noticed that it's specified as Good here

| Mistral | **Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct-2506** | Excellent | Poor | Great | Great | Excellent | Good | Good | Excellent |
| Alibaba Cloud | **Qwen2.5-72b-Instruct** | Excellent | Good | Great | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good | Excellent |

Expand Down