Skip to content

Conversation

@vishaangelova
Copy link
Contributor

@vishaangelova vishaangelova commented Nov 24, 2025

Summary

This PR reworks the env-provider.md doc to add details and examples for using the env provider, including variable chaining and fallbacks.

Closes #1928 and #2475

Generative AI disclosure

  1. Did you use a generative AI (GenAI) tool to assist in creating this contribution?
  • Yes
  • No
  1. Tool(s) and model(s) used:
  • I used Cursor with the gpt-5.1 model to create a first draft and add examples for the env provider’s usage based on the codebase. I then edited the draft to achieve the desired structure, logical flow, and clarity.

Preview

reference/fleet/env-provider.md

@vishaangelova vishaangelova requested a review from a team as a code owner November 24, 2025 19:22
@vishaangelova vishaangelova linked an issue Nov 24, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2025

✅ Vale Linting Results

No issues found on modified lines!

@vishaangelova vishaangelova linked an issue Nov 24, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@philippkahr
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link

@blakerouse blakerouse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much improved and accurate!

@vishaangelova vishaangelova enabled auto-merge (squash) November 25, 2025 08:31
@vishaangelova vishaangelova merged commit 0cd8faa into main Nov 25, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@vishaangelova vishaangelova deleted the 1928-explain-env-provider branch November 25, 2025 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Website]: Missing env provider fallbacks [Website]: Fleet environment providers are badly explained

5 participants