Skip to content

Conversation

trentm
Copy link
Member

@trentm trentm commented Mar 10, 2025

No need for us to be running code from the PR itself, so this event is fine.
Before this change, a workflow run for a PR from a fork would have
'Secret source: None' and hence not have access to the SLACK_BOT_TOKEN

Also be clearer on the 'slack-lite' brand.

Refs: elastic/apm-agent-nodejs#4501

…po secrets

No need for us to be running code from the PR itself, so this event is fine.
Before this change, a workflow run for a PR from a *fork* would have
'Secret source: None' and hence not have access to the SLACK_BOT_TOKEN

Also be clearer on the 'slack-lite' brand.

Refs: elastic/apm-agent-nodejs#4501
@trentm trentm requested a review from david-luna March 10, 2025 19:06
@trentm trentm self-assigned this Mar 10, 2025
@trentm trentm merged commit 717a46e into main Mar 11, 2025
12 checks passed
@trentm trentm deleted the trentm/slack-lite-from-forks branch March 11, 2025 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants