Skip to content

Conversation

@DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor

Makes it explicit that for realistic experiments you need to leave many
of the parameters alone: for instance setting ?concurrency=1 is not a
realistic experiment.

Also adjusts the wording slightly to use the imperative voice more.

Makes it explicit that for realistic experiments you need to leave many
of the parameters alone: for instance setting `?concurrency=1` is not a
realistic experiment.

Also adjusts the wording slightly to use the imperative voice more.
Copy link
Contributor

@szabosteve szabosteve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this improvement! LGTM!

@szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor

@DaveCTurner The CI fails because you opened the PR from a fork. @pquentin What's the recommendation in cases like this?

@DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can reopen this with a branch from the main repo if you'd prefer, tho it is common in all other repositories to work on forks.

@DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor Author

I moved the branch to the main repo and opened #5247 instead, closing this

@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner closed this Sep 2, 2025
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner deleted the 2025/08/28/repo-analysis-parameters-docs branch September 2, 2025 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants